In the present study, we have identified the expectations that employers have for graduates, which include oral communication skills, technical writing skills, project management skills, genuine concern for users and work experience. The current educational model falls short in its delivery of these qualities in their graduates due to certain flaws: corporatization of education, weakened academic community, scarcity of financial and human resources, and ineffective collaboration.

We have introduced the open source software development paradigm, and studied the research and recommendations by CSSE educators and open-source experts. From our study, we have proposed a more effective educational model, which could address the shortcomings of the current model. Our model is heavily based on collaboration between students and academics in software projects, which would help students to develop collaborative skills needed for the industry. It also strengthens the academic community and benefits the general public.

We have identified certain limitations of our proposed model: those of OSSD itself, the reluctance to curriculum changes and student abilities. A thorough feasibility study of the implementation of our model would be needed to address these issues. Unfortunately, it is beyond the scope of this paper, and we
hope to resolve this in future studies. It would be interesting to witness this model in practice, and the impact it has on the education of CSSE students.

References

[D.02] Faber B. D. Educational models and open source: Resisting the proprietary university. In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Computer documentation, pages 31–38, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2002. ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications.

[D.04] Hagan D. Employer satisfaction with ict graduates. In Proceedings of the sixth conference on Australian computing education, volume 3, pages 119–123, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2004. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.

[GPJ04] Sondergaard H. Gruba P., Moffat A. and Zobel J. What drives curriculum change? In Proceedings of the sixth conference on Australian computing education, pages 109–117, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2004. Australian Computer Society, Inc.

[Ini04] Open Source Initiatives. Open source faq. http://www.opensource.org, 2004.

[J.98] Teague J. Personality type, career preference and implications for computer science recruitment and teaching. In Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian conference on Computer science education, pages 155–163, The University of Queensland, Australia, 1998. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.

[JJ03] Tan J. and Phillips J. Challenges of real-world projects in team-based courses. The Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 19(2):265–277, 2003.

[JS03] O’Hara K. J. and Kay J. S. Open source software and computer science education. The Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 18:1–7, 2003.

[PDEG94] Staudenmayer N. Perry D. E. and Votta L. G. Open source software and computer science education. People, organizations, and process improvement, 11:36–45, 1994.

[S.00] Raymond E. S. The cathedral and the bazaar. http://www.catb.org/ esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/, 2000.

[S.04] Raymond E. S. Up from alchemy. IEEE Software, 21(1):88–90, 2004.

[SJ04] Carbone A. Sheard J. From informal to formal: creating the australasian computing education community. In 6th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2004), volume 30, pages 291–297, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2004. Australian Computer Society, Inc.

[T.04] Tavani H. T. Ethics and Technology: Ethical Issues in an Age of Information and Communication Technology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 2004.